MPG

Henry's Law Constants

www.henrys-law.org

Rolf Sander

Atmospheric Chemistry Division

Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry
Mainz, Germany

Home

Henry's Law Constants

Notes

References

Download

Errata

Contact, Imprint, Acknowledgements

When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite this publication:

R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023), doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023

The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015, which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.

Henry's Law Constants → Organic species with oxygen (O) → Alcohols (ROH) → methanol

FORMULA:CH3OH
CAS RN:67-56-1
STRUCTURE
(FROM NIST):
InChIKey:OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hscp d ln Hs cp / d (1/T) References Type Notes
[mol/(m3Pa)] [K]
2.0 5500 Burkholder et al. (2019) L 1)
2.0 5500 Burkholder et al. (2015) L 1)
2.0 5400 Brockbank (2013) L 1)
2.0 5600 Sander et al. (2011) L 1) 389)
2.1 5300 Warneck (2006) L
2.2 5200 Sander et al. (2006) L
2.0 5500 Dohnal et al. (2006) L 1)
1.7 4500 Fogg and Sangster (2003) L
2.1 5400 Plyasunov and Shock (2000) L
3.6×10−2 St-Pierre et al. (2014) M 174)
2.2 5300 O’Farrell and Waghorne (2010) M
2.1 Vitenberg and Dobryakov (2008) M
7.8×10−1 Helburn et al. (2008) M
2.2 5300 Lin and Chou (2006) M
2.0 5600 Teja et al. (2001) M 11) 340)
2.6 5900 Zhu et al. (2000) M
2.0 5500 Gupta et al. (2000) M
1.6 Altschuh et al. (1999) M
2.1 Merk and Riederer (1997) M
1.3 Kaneko et al. (1994) M 14)
2.2 Li and Carr (1993) M
2.6 3900 Pividal et al. (1992) M
2.2 5200 Snider and Dawson (1985) M
2.0 Richon et al. (1985) M
1.3×101 Mazza (1980) M
2.2 Rytting et al. (1978) M
2.3 Burnett (1963) M
2.3 Butler et al. (1935) M 390)
7.6×10−2 Abraham and Acree (2007) V
1.8 6200 Fukuchi et al. (2002) V
1.9 Hwang et al. (1992) V
2.8 Riederer (1990) V
5400 Abraham (1984) V
2.2 5700 Glew and Moelwyn-Hughes (1953) R
2.1 5400 Plyasunov et al. (2001) T
1.5 Yaws (2003) X 259)
1.5 Yaws (2003) X 238)
1.6 5600 Schaffer and Daubert (1969) X 299)
2.2 Gaffney and Senum (1984) X 391)
2.1 Timmermans (1960) X 392)
1.6 Dupeux et al. (2022) Q 260)
2.1 Hayer et al. (2022) Q 20)
5.0×10−1 Keshavarz et al. (2022) Q
2.8 Duchowicz et al. (2020) Q 185)
3.4×10−1 Wang et al. (2017) Q 81) 239)
2.1 Wang et al. (2017) Q 81) 240)
6.6 Wang et al. (2017) Q 81) 241)
2.1 Li et al. (2014) Q 242)
2.0 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 243) 244)
9.9×10−1 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 245)
2.5 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 246)
2.6×10−1 Gharagheizi et al. (2010) Q 247)
2.0 Hilal et al. (2008) Q
2.9 Modarresi et al. (2007) Q 68)
6200 Kühne et al. (2005) Q
2.2 Yaffe et al. (2003) Q 249) 250)
1.1 Yao et al. (2002) Q 230) 268)
2.6 English and Carroll (2001) Q 231) 232)
1.6 Katritzky et al. (1998) Q
1.5 Yaws et al. (1997) Q
2.0 Suzuki et al. (1992) Q 233)
1.8 Nirmalakhandan and Speece (1988) Q
2.4 Taft et al. (1985) Q
2.2 Duchowicz et al. (2020) ? 21) 186)
5000 Kühne et al. (2005) ?
1.9 Yaws (1999) ? 21)
1.1 Abraham and Weathersby (1994) ? 21)
1.4 Yaws and Yang (1992) ? 21)
2.2 Abraham et al. (1990) ?

Data

The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant Hscp at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence d ln Hs cp / d (1/T), also at the reference temperature.

References

  • Abraham, M. H.: Thermodynamics of solution of homologous series of solutes in water, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1, 80, 153–181, doi:10.1039/F19848000153 (1984).
  • Abraham, M. H. & Acree, Jr., W. E.: Prediction of gas to water partition coefficients from 273 to 373 K using predicted enthalpies and heat capacities of hydration, Fluid Phase Equilib., 262, 97–110, doi:10.1016/J.FLUID.2007.08.011 (2007).
  • Abraham, M. H. & Weathersby, P. K.: Hydrogen bonding. 30. Solubility of gases and vapors in biological liquids and tissues, J. Pharm. Sci., 83, 1450–1456, doi:10.1002/JPS.2600831017 (1994).
  • Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Fuchs, R., & Chambers, E. J.: Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 291–300, doi:10.1039/P29900000291 (1990).
  • Altschuh, J., Brüggemann, R., Santl, H., Eichinger, G., & Piringer, O. G.: Henry’s law constants for a diverse set of organic chemicals: Experimental determination and comparison of estimation methods, Chemosphere, 39, 1871–1887, doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00082-X (1999).
  • Brockbank, S. A.: Aqueous Henry’s law constants, infinite dilution activity coefficients, and water solubility: critically evaluated database, experimental analysis, and prediction methods, Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University, USA, URL https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3691/ (2013).
  • Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., & Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 18, JPL Publication 15-10, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, URL https://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov (2015).
  • Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Cappa, C., Crounse, J. D., Dibble, T. S., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Percival, C. J., Wilmouth, D. M., & Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 19, JPL Publication 19-5, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, URL https://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov (2019).
  • Burnett, M. G.: Determination of partition coefficients at infinite dilution by the gas chromatographic analysis of the vapor above dilute solutions, Anal. Chem., 35, 1567–1570, doi:10.1021/AC60204A007 (1963).
  • Butler, J. A. V., Ramchandani, C. N., & Thomson, D. W.: The solubility of non-electrolytes. Part I. The free energy of hydration of some aliphatic alcohols, J. Chem. Soc., pp. 280–285, doi:10.1039/JR9350000280 (1935).
  • Dohnal, V., Fenclová, D., & Vrbka, P.: Temperature dependences of limiting activity coefficients, Henry’s law constants, and derivative infinite dilution properties of lower (C1-C5) 1-alkanols in water. critical compilation, correlation, and recommended data, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 35, 1621–1651, doi:10.1063/1.2203355 (2006).
  • Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
  • Dupeux, T., Gaudin, T., Marteau-Roussy, C., Aubry, J.-M., & Nardello-Rataj, V.: COSMO-RS as an effective tool for predicting the physicochemical properties of fragrance raw materials, Flavour Fragrance J., 37, 106–120, doi:10.1002/FFJ.3690 (2022).
  • English, N. J. & Carroll, D. G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by a quantitative structure property relationship and neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1150–1161, doi:10.1021/CI010361D (2001).
  • Fogg, P. & Sangster, J.: Chemicals in the Atmosphere: Solubility, Sources and Reactivity, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-98651-5 (2003).
  • Fukuchi, K., Miyoshi, K., Watanabe, T., Yonezawa, S., & Arai, Y.: Measurement and correlation of infinite dilution activity coefficients of alkanol or ether in aqueous solution, Fluid Phase Equilib., 194-197, 937–945, doi:10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00675-6 (2002).
  • Gaffney, J. S. & Senum, G. I.: Peroxides, peracids, aldehydes, and PANs and their links to natural and anthropogenic organic sources, in: Gas-Liquid Chemistry of Natural Waters, edited by Newman, L., pp. 5–1–5–7, NTIS TIC-4500, UC-11, BNL 51757 Brookhaven National Laboratory (1984).
  • Gharagheizi, F., Abbasi, R., & Tirandazi, B.: Prediction of Henry’s law constant of organic compounds in water from a new group-contribution-based model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 10 149–10 152, doi:10.1021/IE101532E (2010).
  • Glew, D. N. & Moelwyn-Hughes, E. A.: Chemical statics of the methyl halides in water, Discuss. Faraday Soc., 15, 150–161, doi:10.1039/DF9531500150 (1953).
  • Gupta, A. K., Teja, A. S., Chai, X. S., & Zhu, J. Y.: Henry’s constants of n-alkanols (methanol through n-hexanol) in water at temperatures between 40∘C and 90∘C, Fluid Phase Equilib., 170, 183–192, doi:10.1016/S0378-3812(00)00350-2 (2000).
  • Hayer, N., Jirasek, F., & Hasse, H.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by matrix completion, AIChE J., 68, e17 753, doi:10.1002/AIC.17753 (2022).
  • Helburn, R., Albritton, J., Howe, G., Michael, L., & Franke, D.: Henry’s law constants for fragrance and organic solvent compounds in aqueous industrial surfactants, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 53, 1071–1079, doi:10.1021/JE700418A (2008).
  • Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
  • Hwang, Y.-L., Olson, J. D., & Keller, II, G. E.: Steam stripping for removal of organic pollutants from water. 2. Vapor-liquid equilibrium data, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1759–1768, doi:10.1021/IE00007A022 (1992).
  • Kaneko, T., Wang, P. Y., & Sato, A.: Partition coefficients of some acetate esters and alcohols in water, blood, olive oil, and rat tissues, Occup. Environ. Med., 51, 68–72, doi:10.1136/OEM.51.1.68 (1994).
  • Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
  • Keshavarz, M. H., Rezaei, M., & Hosseini, S. H.: A simple approach for prediction of Henry’s law constant of pesticides, solvents, aromatic hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants without using complex computer codes and descriptors, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 162, 867–877, doi:10.1016/J.PSEP.2022.04.045 (2022).
  • Kühne, R., Ebert, R.-U., & Schüürmann, G.: Prediction of the temperature dependency of Henry’s law constant from chemical structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6705–6711, doi:10.1021/ES050527H (2005).
  • Li, J. & Carr, P. W.: Measurement of water-hexadecane partition coefficients by headspace gas chromatography and calculation of limiting activity coefficients in water, Anal. Chem., 65, 1443–1450, doi:10.1021/AC00058A023 (1993).
  • Li, H., Wang, X., Yi, T., Xu, Z., & Liu, X.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants for organic compounds using multilayer feedforward neural networks based on linear salvation energy relationship, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 6, 1557–1564 (2014).
  • Lin, J.-H. & Chou, M.-S.: Temperature effects on Henry’s law constants for four VOCs in air-activated sludge systems, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2469–2477, doi:10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2005.12.037 (2006).
  • Mazza, G.: Relative volatilities of some onion flavour components, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 15, 35–41, doi:10.1111/J.1365-2621.1980.TB00916.X (1980).
  • Merk, S. & Riederer, M.: Sorption of volatile C1 to C6 alkanols in plant cuticles, J. Exp. Bot., 48, 1095–1104, doi:10.1093/JXB/48.5.1095 (1997).
  • Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
  • Nirmalakhandan, N. N. & Speece, R. E.: QSAR model for predicting Henry’s constant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 22, 1349–1357, doi:10.1021/ES00176A016 (1988).
  • O’Farrell, C. E. & Waghorne, W. E.: Henry’s law constants of organic compounds in water and n-octane at T = 293.2K, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55, 1655–1658, doi:10.1021/JE900711H (2010).
  • Pividal, K. A., Birtigh, A., & Sandler, S. I.: Infinite dilution activity coefficients for oxygenate systems determined using a differential static cell, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 37, 484–487, doi:10.1021/JE00008A025 (1992).
  • Plyasunov, A. V. & Shock, E. L.: Thermodynamic functions of hydration of hydrocarbons at 298.15K and 0.1MPa, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 439–468, doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00330-0 (2000).
  • Plyasunov, A. V., O’Connell, J. P., Wood, R. H., & Shock, E. L.: Semiempirical equation of state for the infinite dilution thermodynamic functions of hydration of nonelectrolytes over wide ranges of temperature and pressure, Fluid Phase Equilib., 183–184, 133–142, doi:10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00427-7 (2001).
  • Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., & Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry’s law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7643–7654, doi:10.5194/ACP-10-7643-2010 (2010).
  • Richon, D., Sorrentino, F., & Voilley, A.: Infinite dilution activity coefficients by the inert gas stripping method: extension to the study of viscous and foaming mixtures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 24, 1160–1165, doi:10.1021/I200031A044 (1985).
  • Riederer, M.: Estimating partitioning and transport of organic chemicals in the foliage/atmosphere system: discussion of a fugacity-based model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 829–837, doi:10.1021/ES00076A006 (1990).
  • Rytting, J. H., Huston, L. P., & Higuchi, T.: Thermodynamic group contributions for hydroxyl, amino, and methylene groups, J. Pharm. Sci., 69, 615–618, doi:10.1002/JPS.2600670510 (1978).
  • Sander, S. P., Friedl, R. R., Golden, D. M., Kurylo, M. J., Moortgat, G. K., Keller-Rudek, H., Wine, P. H., Ravishankara, A. R., Kolb, C. E., Molina, M. J., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., Huie, R. E., & Orkin, V. L.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 15, JPL Publication 06-2, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, URL https://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov (2006).
  • Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Burkholder, J. B., Friedl, R. R., Golden, D. M., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Moortgat, G. K., Orkin, V. L., & Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 17, JPL Publication 10-6, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, URL https://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov (2011).
  • Schaffer, D. L. & Daubert, T. E.: Gas-liquid chromatographic determination of solution properties of oxygenated compounds in water, Anal. Chem., 41, 1585–1589, doi:10.1021/AC60281A016 (1969).
  • Snider, J. R. & Dawson, G. A.: Tropospheric light alcohols, carbonyls, and acetonitrile: Concentrations in the southwestern United States and Henry’s law data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 3797–3805, doi:10.1029/JD090ID02P03797 (1985).
  • St-Pierre, J., Wetton, B., Zhai, Y., & Gea, J.: Liquid water scavenging of PEMFC contaminants, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, E3357–E3364, doi:10.1149/2.0291409JES (2014).
  • Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., & Koide, K.: Application of principal components analysis to calculate Henry’s constant from molecular structure, Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-L (1992).
  • Taft, R. W., Abraham, M. H., Doherty, R. M., & Kamlet, M. J.: The molecular properties governing solubilities of organic nonelectrolytes in water, Nature, 313, 384–386, doi:10.1038/313384A0 (1985).
  • Teja, A. S., Gupta, A. K., Bullock, K., Chai, X.-S., & Zhu, J.: Henry’s constants of methanol in aqueous systems containing salts, Fluid Phase Equilib., 185, 265–274, doi:10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00476-9 (2001).
  • Timmermans, J.: The Physico-Chemical Constants of Binary Systems in Concentrated Solutions, Vol. 4, Interscience Publisher, Inc., New York, NY (1960).
  • Vitenberg, A. G. & Dobryakov, Y. G.: Gas-chromatographic determination of the distribution ratios of volatile substances in gas-liquid systems, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 81, 339–359, doi:10.1134/S1070427208030014 (2008).
  • Wang, C., Yuan, T., Wood, S. A., Goss, K.-U., Li, J., Ying, Q., & Wania, F.: Uncertain Henry’s law constants compromise equilibrium partitioning calculations of atmospheric oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7529–7540, doi:10.5194/ACP-17-7529-2017 (2017).
  • Warneck, P.: A note on the temperature dependence of Henry’s Law coefficients for methanol and ethanol, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7146–7151, doi:10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2006.06.024 (2006).
  • Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
  • Yao, X., aand X. Zhang, M. L., Hu, Z., & Fan, B.: Radial basis function network-based quantitative structure-property relationship for the prediction of Henry’s law constant, Anal. Chim. Acta, 462, 101–117, doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00273-8 (2002).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Chemical Properties Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN 0070734011 (1999).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Yaws’ Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds, Knovel: Norwich, NY, USA, ISBN 1591244447 (2003).
  • Yaws, C. L. & Yang, H.-C.: Henry’s law constant for compound in water, in: Thermodynamic and Physical Property Data, edited by Yaws, C. L., pp. 181–206, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX, ISBN 0884150313 (1992).
  • Yaws, C. L., Hopper, J. R., Sheth, S. D., Han, M., & Pike, R. W.: Solubility and Henry’s law constant for alcohols in water, Waste Manage., 17, 541–547, doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(97)10057-5 (1997).
  • Zhu, J. Y., Liu, P. H., Chai, X. S., Bullock, K. R., & Teja, A. S.: Henry’s law constant of methanol in pulping spent liquors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 1742–1746, doi:10.1021/ES990415O (2000).

Type

Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V) VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T) thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C) citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1 of Sander (2023) for further details.

Notes

1) A detailed temperature dependence with more than one parameter is available in the original publication. Here, only the temperature dependence at 298.15 K according to the van 't Hoff equation is presented.
11) Measured at high temperature and extrapolated to T⊖ = 298.15 K.
14) Value at T = 310 K.
20) Calculated using machine learning matrix completion methods (MCMs).
21) Several references are given in the list of Henry's law constants but not assigned to specific species.
68) Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here.
81) Value at T = 288 K.
174) Value at T = 353 K.
185) Value from the validation set for checking whether the model is satisfactory for compounds that are absent from the training set.
186) Experimental value, extracted from HENRYWIN.
230) Yao et al. (2002) compared two QSPR methods and found that radial basis function networks (RBFNs) are better than multiple linear regression. In their paper, they provide neither a definition nor the unit of their Henry's law constants. Comparing the values with those that they cite from Yaws (1999), it is assumed that they use the variant Hvpx and the unit atm.
231) English and Carroll (2001) provide several calculations. Here, the preferred value with explicit inclusion of hydrogen bonding parameters from a neural network is shown.
232) Value from the training dataset.
233) Calculated with a principal component analysis (PCA); see Suzuki et al. (1992) for details.
238) Value given here as quoted by Gharagheizi et al. (2010).
239) Calculated using linear free energy relationships (LFERs).
240) Calculated using SPARC Performs Automated Reasoning in Chemistry (SPARC).
241) Calculated using COSMOtherm.
242) Temperature is not specified.
243) Value from the training dataset.
244) Calculated using the GROMHE model.
245) Calculated using the SPARC approach.
246) Calculated using the HENRYWIN method.
247) Calculated using a combination of a group contribution method and neural networks.
249) Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here.
250) Value from the training set.
259) Value given here as quoted by Dupeux et al. (2022).
260) Calculated using the COSMO-RS method.
268) Value from the test set.
299) Value given here as quoted by Staudinger and Roberts (1996).
340) Values for salt solutions are also available from this reference.
389) The H298 and A, B, C data listed in Table 5.4 of Sander et al. (2011) are inconsistent, with 92 % difference.
390) This paper supersedes earlier work with more concentrated solutions (Butler et al., 1933).
391) Value given here as quoted by Gaffney et al. (1987).
392) Value given here as quoted by Hine and Weimar (1965).

The numbers of the notes are the same as in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be found here.

* * *

Search Henry's Law Database

Species Search:
Identifier Search:
Reference Search:

* * *

Convert Henry's Law Constants

Convert:

* * *