When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite
this publication:
R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for
water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023),
doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023
The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015,
which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.
|
FORMULA: | C6H14O |
CAS RN: | 565-67-3 |
STRUCTURE
(FROM
NIST):
|
|
InChIKey: | ISTJMQSHILQAEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
|
|
References |
Type |
Notes |
[mol/(m3Pa)] |
[K] |
|
|
|
2.9×10−1 |
|
Hine and Mookerjee (1975) |
V |
|
1.7×10−1 |
|
Wang et al. (2017) |
Q |
81)
239)
|
6.9×10−1 |
|
Wang et al. (2017) |
Q |
81)
240)
|
1.4×10−1 |
|
Wang et al. (2017) |
Q |
81)
241)
|
3.3×10−1 |
|
Hilal et al. (2008) |
Q |
|
5.8×10−1 |
|
Modarresi et al. (2007) |
Q |
68)
|
2.9×10−1 |
|
Yaffe et al. (2003) |
Q |
249)
250)
|
3.7×10−1 |
|
English and Carroll (2001) |
Q |
231)
275)
|
3.7×10−1 |
|
Yaws et al. (1997) |
Q |
|
4.2×10−1 |
|
Suzuki et al. (1992) |
Q |
233)
|
5.2×10−1 |
|
Nirmalakhandan and Speece (1988) |
Q |
|
2.9×10−1 |
|
Abraham et al. (1990) |
? |
|
Data
The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant
at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence
, also at the
reference temperature.
References
-
Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Fuchs, R., & Chambers, E. J.: Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 291–300, doi:10.1039/P29900000291 (1990).
-
English, N. J. & Carroll, D. G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by a quantitative structure property relationship and neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1150–1161, doi:10.1021/CI010361D (2001).
-
Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
-
Hine, J. & Mookerjee, P. K.: The intrinsic hydrophilic character of organic compounds. Correlations in terms of structural contributions, J. Org. Chem., 40, 292–298, doi:10.1021/JO00891A006 (1975).
-
Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
-
Nirmalakhandan, N. N. & Speece, R. E.: QSAR model for predicting Henry’s constant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 22, 1349–1357, doi:10.1021/ES00176A016 (1988).
-
Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., & Koide, K.: Application of principal components analysis to calculate Henry’s constant from molecular structure, Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-L (1992).
-
Wang, C., Yuan, T., Wood, S. A., Goss, K.-U., Li, J., Ying, Q., & Wania, F.: Uncertain Henry’s law constants compromise equilibrium partitioning calculations of atmospheric oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7529–7540, doi:10.5194/ACP-17-7529-2017 (2017).
-
Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
-
Yaws, C. L., Hopper, J. R., Sheth, S. D., Han, M., & Pike, R. W.: Solubility and Henry’s law constant for alcohols in water, Waste Manage., 17, 541–547, doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(97)10057-5 (1997).
Type
Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing
the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V)
VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T)
thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C)
citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1
of Sander (2023) for further details.
Notes
68) |
Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here. |
81) |
Value at T = 288 K. |
231) |
English and Carroll (2001) provide several calculations. Here, the preferred value with explicit inclusion of hydrogen bonding parameters from a neural network is shown. |
233) |
Calculated with a principal component analysis (PCA); see Suzuki et al. (1992) for details. |
239) |
Calculated using linear free energy relationships (LFERs). |
240) |
Calculated using SPARC Performs Automated Reasoning in Chemistry (SPARC). |
241) |
Calculated using COSMOtherm. |
249) |
Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here. |
250) |
Value from the training set. |
275) |
Value from the test dataset. |
The numbers of the notes are the same as
in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be
found here.
|
* * *
Search Henry's Law Database
* * *
Convert Henry's Law Constants
* * *
|