When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite
this publication:
R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for
water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023),
doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023
The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015,
which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.
|
FORMULA: | C6H12O |
CAS RN: | 565-69-5 |
STRUCTURE
(FROM
NIST):
|
|
InChIKey: | HYTRYEXINDDXJK-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
|
|
References |
Type |
Notes |
[mol/(m3Pa)] |
[K] |
|
|
|
5.3×10−2 |
|
Plyasunov and Shock (2001) |
L |
|
5.2×10−2 |
6100 |
Hovorka et al. (2019) |
M |
|
6.4×10−2 |
|
Duchowicz et al. (2020) |
V |
187)
|
1.3×10−2 |
|
Duchowicz et al. (2020) |
Q |
|
4.0×10−2 |
|
Wang et al. (2017) |
Q |
81)
239)
|
9.3×10−2 |
|
Wang et al. (2017) |
Q |
81)
240)
|
1.1×10−1 |
|
Wang et al. (2017) |
Q |
81)
241)
|
9.9×10−2 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
243)
244)
|
4.9×10−2 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
245)
|
7.8×10−2 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
246)
|
6.5×10−2 |
|
Hilal et al. (2008) |
Q |
|
1.6×10−1 |
|
Modarresi et al. (2007) |
Q |
68)
|
9.7×10−2 |
|
Yaffe et al. (2003) |
Q |
249)
273)
|
2.3×10−2 |
|
Katritzky et al. (1998) |
Q |
|
6.4×10−2 |
|
Yaws et al. (1998) |
? |
|
Data
The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant
at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence
, also at the
reference temperature.
References
-
Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
-
Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
-
Hovorka, Š., Vrbka, P., Bermúdez-Salguero, C., Böhme, A., & Dohnal, V.: Air–water partitioning of C5 and C6 alkanones: measurement, critical compilation, correlation, and recommended data, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 64, 5765–5774, doi:10.1021/ACS.JCED.9B00726 (2019).
-
Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
-
Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
-
Plyasunov, A. V. & Shock, E. L.: Group contribution values of the infinite dilution thermodynamic functions of hydration for aliphatic noncyclic hydrocarbons, alcohols, and ketones at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 46, 1016–1019, doi:10.1021/JE0002282 (2001).
-
Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., & Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry’s law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7643–7654, doi:10.5194/ACP-10-7643-2010 (2010).
-
Wang, C., Yuan, T., Wood, S. A., Goss, K.-U., Li, J., Ying, Q., & Wania, F.: Uncertain Henry’s law constants compromise equilibrium partitioning calculations of atmospheric oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7529–7540, doi:10.5194/ACP-17-7529-2017 (2017).
-
Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
-
Yaws, C. L., Sheth, S. D., & Han, M.: Using solubility and Henry’s law constant data for ketones in water, Pollut. Eng., 30, 44–46 (1998).
Type
Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing
the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V)
VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T)
thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C)
citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1
of Sander (2023) for further details.
Notes
68) |
Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here. |
81) |
Value at T = 288 K. |
187) |
Estimation based on the quotient between vapor pressure and water solubility, extracted from HENRYWIN. |
239) |
Calculated using linear free energy relationships (LFERs). |
240) |
Calculated using SPARC Performs Automated Reasoning in Chemistry (SPARC). |
241) |
Calculated using COSMOtherm. |
243) |
Value from the training dataset. |
244) |
Calculated using the GROMHE model. |
245) |
Calculated using the SPARC approach. |
246) |
Calculated using the HENRYWIN method. |
249) |
Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here. |
273) |
Value from the test set. |
The numbers of the notes are the same as
in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be
found here.
|
* * *
Search Henry's Law Database
* * *
Convert Henry's Law Constants
* * *
|