When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite
this publication:
R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for
water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023),
doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023
The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015,
which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.
|
FORMULA: | C8H16 |
CAS RN: | 1678-91-7 |
STRUCTURE
(FROM
NIST):
|
|
InChIKey: | IIEWJVIFRVWJOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
|
|
References |
Type |
Notes |
[mol/(m3Pa)] |
[K] |
|
|
|
2.1×10−5 |
4100 |
Brockbank (2013) |
L |
1)
305)
|
2.0×10−5 |
4400 |
Dohányosová et al. (2004) |
M |
306)
|
3.1×10−5 |
4600 |
Heidman et al. (1985) |
M |
1)
|
3.3×10−5 |
|
Duchowicz et al. (2020) |
V |
187)
|
7.3×10−6 |
|
Abraham and Acree (2007) |
V |
|
1.5×10−5 |
|
Yaws (2003) |
X |
238)
|
1.4×10−3 |
|
Duchowicz et al. (2020) |
Q |
|
1.3×10−5 |
|
Gharagheizi et al. (2012) |
Q |
|
1.6×10−5 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
243)
244)
|
3.1×10−5 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
245)
|
2.0×10−5 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
246)
|
1.5×10−5 |
|
Gharagheizi et al. (2010) |
Q |
247)
|
2.3×10−5 |
|
Hilal et al. (2008) |
Q |
|
|
4300 |
Kühne et al. (2005) |
Q |
|
3.3×10−5 |
|
Yaffe et al. (2003) |
Q |
249)
250)
|
3.5×10−5 |
|
Yao et al. (2002) |
Q |
230)
268)
|
3.4×10−5 |
|
Katritzky et al. (1998) |
Q |
|
|
4700 |
Kühne et al. (2005) |
? |
|
1.5×10−5 |
|
Yaws (1999) |
? |
21)
|
Data
The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant
at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence
, also at the
reference temperature.
References
-
Abraham, M. H. & Acree, Jr., W. E.: Prediction of gas to water partition coefficients from 273 to 373 K using predicted enthalpies and heat capacities of hydration, Fluid Phase Equilib., 262, 97–110, doi:10.1016/J.FLUID.2007.08.011 (2007).
-
Brockbank, S. A.: Aqueous Henry’s law constants, infinite dilution activity coefficients, and water solubility: critically evaluated database, experimental analysis, and prediction methods, Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University, USA, URL https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3691/ (2013).
-
Dohányosová, P., Sarraute, S., Dohnal, V., Majer, V., & Costa Gomes, M.: Aqueous solubility and related thermodynamic functions of nonaromatic hydrocarbons as a function of molecular structure, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 2805–2815, doi:10.1021/IE030800T (2004).
-
Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
-
Gharagheizi, F., Abbasi, R., & Tirandazi, B.: Prediction of Henry’s law constant of organic compounds in water from a new group-contribution-based model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 10 149–10 152, doi:10.1021/IE101532E (2010).
-
Gharagheizi, F., Eslamimanesh, A., Mohammadi, A. H., & Richon, D.: Empirical method for estimation of Henry’s law constant of non-electrolyte organic compounds in water, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 47, 295–299, doi:10.1016/J.JCT.2011.11.015 (2012).
-
Heidman, J. L., Tsonopoulos, C., Brady, C. J., & Wilson, G. M.: High-temperature mutual solubilities of hydrocarbons and water. Part II: Ethylbenzene, ethylcyclohexane, and n-octane, AIChE J., 31, 376–384, doi:10.1002/AIC.690310304 (1985).
-
Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
-
Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
-
Kühne, R., Ebert, R.-U., & Schüürmann, G.: Prediction of the temperature dependency of Henry’s law constant from chemical structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6705–6711, doi:10.1021/ES050527H (2005).
-
Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., & Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry’s law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7643–7654, doi:10.5194/ACP-10-7643-2010 (2010).
-
Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
-
Yao, X., aand X. Zhang, M. L., Hu, Z., & Fan, B.: Radial basis function network-based quantitative structure-property relationship for the prediction of Henry’s law constant, Anal. Chim. Acta, 462, 101–117, doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00273-8 (2002).
-
Yaws, C. L.: Chemical Properties Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN 0070734011 (1999).
-
Yaws, C. L.: Yaws’ Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds, Knovel: Norwich, NY, USA, ISBN 1591244447 (2003).
Type
Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing
the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V)
VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T)
thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C)
citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1
of Sander (2023) for further details.
Notes
1) |
A detailed temperature dependence with more than one parameter is available in the original publication. Here, only the temperature dependence at 298.15 K according to the van 't Hoff equation is presented. |
21) |
Several references are given in the list of Henry's law constants but not assigned to specific species. |
187) |
Estimation based on the quotient between vapor pressure and water solubility, extracted from HENRYWIN. |
230) |
Yao et al. (2002) compared two QSPR methods and found that radial basis function networks (RBFNs) are better than multiple linear regression. In their paper, they provide neither a definition nor the unit of their Henry's law constants. Comparing the values with those that they cite from Yaws (1999), it is assumed that they use the variant Hvpx and the unit atm. |
238) |
Value given here as quoted by Gharagheizi et al. (2010). |
243) |
Value from the training dataset. |
244) |
Calculated using the GROMHE model. |
245) |
Calculated using the SPARC approach. |
246) |
Calculated using the HENRYWIN method. |
247) |
Calculated using a combination of a group contribution method and neural networks. |
249) |
Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here. |
250) |
Value from the training set. |
268) |
Value from the test set. |
305) |
Values at 298 K in Tables C2 and C5 of Brockbank (2013) are inconsistent, with 6 % difference. |
306) |
The data from Dohányosová et al. (2004) were fitted to the three-parameter equation: Hscp= exp( −346.32561 +18710.63122/T +47.87398 ln(T)) mol m−3 Pa−1, with T in K. |
The numbers of the notes are the same as
in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be
found here.
|
* * *
Search Henry's Law Database
* * *
Convert Henry's Law Constants
* * *
|