When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite
this publication:
R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for
water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023),
doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023
The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015,
which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.
|
FORMULA: | C5H10O |
TRIVIAL NAME:
|
THP
|
CAS RN: | 142-68-7 |
STRUCTURE
(FROM
NIST):
|
|
InChIKey: | DHXVGJBLRPWPCS-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
|
|
References |
Type |
Notes |
[mol/(m3Pa)] |
[K] |
|
|
|
8.1×10−2 |
5800 |
Brockbank (2013) |
L |
1)
|
8.3×10−2 |
5900 |
Ondo and Dohnal (2007) |
M |
1)
|
1.0×10−1 |
|
Mackay et al. (2006c) |
V |
|
1.0×10−1 |
|
Mackay et al. (1993) |
V |
|
7.8×10−2 |
5900 |
Cabani et al. (1971b) |
T |
|
1.5×10−1 |
|
Keshavarz et al. (2022) |
Q |
|
1.4×10−1 |
|
Duchowicz et al. (2020) |
Q |
|
2.0×10−2 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
243)
244)
|
2.0×10−1 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
245)
|
7.8×10−2 |
|
Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) |
Q |
246)
|
1.1×10−1 |
|
Hilal et al. (2008) |
Q |
|
6.9×10−2 |
|
Modarresi et al. (2007) |
Q |
68)
|
7.9×10−2 |
|
Yaffe et al. (2003) |
Q |
249)
250)
|
2.0×10−1 |
|
English and Carroll (2001) |
Q |
231)
275)
|
2.6×10−2 |
|
Katritzky et al. (1998) |
Q |
|
9.9×10−2 |
|
Suzuki et al. (1992) |
Q |
233)
|
7.9×10−2 |
|
Duchowicz et al. (2020) |
? |
21)
186)
|
7.9×10−2 |
|
Abraham et al. (1990) |
? |
|
Data
The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant
at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence
, also at the
reference temperature.
References
-
Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Fuchs, R., & Chambers, E. J.: Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 291–300, doi:10.1039/P29900000291 (1990).
-
Brockbank, S. A.: Aqueous Henry’s law constants, infinite dilution activity coefficients, and water solubility: critically evaluated database, experimental analysis, and prediction methods, Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University, USA, URL https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3691/ (2013).
-
Cabani, S., Conti, G., & Lepori, L.: Thermodynamic study on aqueous dilute solutions of organic compounds. Part 2. – Cyclic ethers, Trans. Faraday Soc., 67, 1943–1950, doi:10.1039/TF9716701943 (1971b).
-
Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
-
English, N. J. & Carroll, D. G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by a quantitative structure property relationship and neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1150–1161, doi:10.1021/CI010361D (2001).
-
Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
-
Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
-
Keshavarz, M. H., Rezaei, M., & Hosseini, S. H.: A simple approach for prediction of Henry’s law constant of pesticides, solvents, aromatic hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants without using complex computer codes and descriptors, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 162, 867–877, doi:10.1016/J.PSEP.2022.04.045 (2022).
-
Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., & Ma, K. C.: Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. III of Volatile Organic Chemicals, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, ISBN 0873719735 (1993).
-
Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., Ma, K. C., & Lee, S. C.: Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. III of Oxygen Containing Compounds, CRC/Taylor & Francis Group, doi:10.1201/9781420044393 (2006c).
-
Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
-
Ondo, D. & Dohnal, V.: Temperature dependence of limiting activity coefficients and Henry’s law constants of cyclic and open-chain ethers in water, Fluid Phase Equilib., 262, 121–136, doi:10.1016/J.FLUID.2007.08.013 (2007).
-
Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., & Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry’s law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7643–7654, doi:10.5194/ACP-10-7643-2010 (2010).
-
Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., & Koide, K.: Application of principal components analysis to calculate Henry’s constant from molecular structure, Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-L (1992).
-
Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
Type
Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing
the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V)
VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T)
thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C)
citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1
of Sander (2023) for further details.
Notes
1) |
A detailed temperature dependence with more than one parameter is available in the original publication. Here, only the temperature dependence at 298.15 K according to the van 't Hoff equation is presented. |
21) |
Several references are given in the list of Henry's law constants but not assigned to specific species. |
68) |
Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here. |
186) |
Experimental value, extracted from HENRYWIN. |
231) |
English and Carroll (2001) provide several calculations. Here, the preferred value with explicit inclusion of hydrogen bonding parameters from a neural network is shown. |
233) |
Calculated with a principal component analysis (PCA); see Suzuki et al. (1992) for details. |
243) |
Value from the training dataset. |
244) |
Calculated using the GROMHE model. |
245) |
Calculated using the SPARC approach. |
246) |
Calculated using the HENRYWIN method. |
249) |
Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here. |
250) |
Value from the training set. |
275) |
Value from the test dataset. |
The numbers of the notes are the same as
in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be
found here.
|
* * *
Search Henry's Law Database
* * *
Convert Henry's Law Constants
* * *
|