MPG

Henry's Law Constants

www.henrys-law.org

Rolf Sander

Atmospheric Chemistry Division

Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry
Mainz, Germany

Home

Henry's Law Constants

Notes

References

Download

Errata

Contact, Imprint, Acknowledgements

When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite this publication:

R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023), doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023

The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015, which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.

Henry's Law Constants → Organic species with oxygen (O) → Esters (RCOOR) → 3-methylbutyl ethanoate

FORMULA:CH3COOC5H11
TRIVIAL NAME: isoamyl acetate
CAS RN:123-92-2
STRUCTURE
(FROM NIST):
InChIKey:MLFHJEHSLIIPHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hscp d ln Hs cp / d (1/T) References Type Notes
[mol/(m3Pa)] [K]
2.1×10−2 6700 Brockbank (2013) L 1)
2.0×10−2 6500 Plyasunov et al. (2004) L
2.2×10−2 6600 Ammari and Schroen (2019) M 11)
8.8×10−2 4300 Meynier et al. (2003) M 38)
8.8×10−3 Kaneko et al. (1994) M 14)
2.6×10−2 Mackay et al. (2006c) V
2.6×10−2 Mackay et al. (1995) V
2.1×10−2 Meylan and Howard (1991) V
1.7×10−2 Hine and Mookerjee (1975) V
2.2×10−2 Yaws (2003) X 238)
2.4×10−2 5000 Goldstein (1982) X 299)
1.7×10−2 Meynier et al. (2003) C
5.3×10−2 Keshavarz et al. (2022) Q
7.0 Abney (2021) Q 401)
3.3×10−2 Duchowicz et al. (2020) Q 300)
1.2×10−2 Gharagheizi et al. (2012) Q
2.5×10−2 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 244) 272)
2.5×10−2 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 245)
2.0×10−2 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 246)
2.7×10−2 Gharagheizi et al. (2010) Q 247)
2.6×10−2 Hilal et al. (2008) Q
3.2×10−2 Modarresi et al. (2007) Q 68)
1.8×10−2 Yaffe et al. (2003) Q 249) 250)
1.6×10−2 Yao et al. (2002) Q 230)
2.4×10−2 English and Carroll (2001) Q 231) 232)
3.8×10−2 Katritzky et al. (1998) Q
1.7×10−2 Suzuki et al. (1992) Q 233)
1.8×10−2 Meylan and Howard (1991) Q
1.8×10−2 Nirmalakhandan and Speece (1988) Q
1.7×10−2 Duchowicz et al. (2020) ? 21) 186)
2.1×10−2 Yaws (1999) ? 21)
1.7×10−2 Abraham et al. (1990) ?

Data

The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant Hscp at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence d ln Hs cp / d (1/T), also at the reference temperature.

References

  • Abney, C. A.: Predicting Henry’s Law constants of volatile organic compounds present in bourbon using molecular simulations, Master’s thesis, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA, doi:10.18297/etd/3440 (2021).
  • Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Fuchs, R., & Chambers, E. J.: Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 291–300, doi:10.1039/P29900000291 (1990).
  • Ammari, A. & Schroen, K.: Effect of ethanol and temperature on partition coefficients of ethyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, and isoamyl alcohol: Instrumental and predictive investigation, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 64, 3224–3230, doi:10.1021/ACS.JCED.8B01125 (2019).
  • Brockbank, S. A.: Aqueous Henry’s law constants, infinite dilution activity coefficients, and water solubility: critically evaluated database, experimental analysis, and prediction methods, Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University, USA, URL https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3691/ (2013).
  • Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
  • English, N. J. & Carroll, D. G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by a quantitative structure property relationship and neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1150–1161, doi:10.1021/CI010361D (2001).
  • Gharagheizi, F., Abbasi, R., & Tirandazi, B.: Prediction of Henry’s law constant of organic compounds in water from a new group-contribution-based model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 10 149–10 152, doi:10.1021/IE101532E (2010).
  • Gharagheizi, F., Eslamimanesh, A., Mohammadi, A. H., & Richon, D.: Empirical method for estimation of Henry’s law constant of non-electrolyte organic compounds in water, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 47, 295–299, doi:10.1016/J.JCT.2011.11.015 (2012).
  • Goldstein, D. J.: Air and steam stripping of toxic pollutants, Appendix 3: Henry’s law constants, Tech. Rep. EPA-68-03-002, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, USA (1982).
  • Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
  • Hine, J. & Mookerjee, P. K.: The intrinsic hydrophilic character of organic compounds. Correlations in terms of structural contributions, J. Org. Chem., 40, 292–298, doi:10.1021/JO00891A006 (1975).
  • Kaneko, T., Wang, P. Y., & Sato, A.: Partition coefficients of some acetate esters and alcohols in water, blood, olive oil, and rat tissues, Occup. Environ. Med., 51, 68–72, doi:10.1136/OEM.51.1.68 (1994).
  • Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
  • Keshavarz, M. H., Rezaei, M., & Hosseini, S. H.: A simple approach for prediction of Henry’s law constant of pesticides, solvents, aromatic hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants without using complex computer codes and descriptors, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 162, 867–877, doi:10.1016/J.PSEP.2022.04.045 (2022).
  • Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., & Ma, K. C.: Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. IV of Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Containing Compounds, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, ISBN 1566700353 (1995).
  • Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., Ma, K. C., & Lee, S. C.: Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. III of Oxygen Containing Compounds, CRC/Taylor & Francis Group, doi:10.1201/9781420044393 (2006c).
  • Meylan, W. M. & Howard, P. H.: Bond contribution method for estimating Henry’s law constants, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10, 1283–1293, doi:10.1002/ETC.5620101007 (1991).
  • Meynier, A., Garillon, A., Lethuaut, L., & Genot, C.: Partition of five aroma compounds between air and skim milk, anhydrous milk fat or full-fat cream, Lait, 83, 223–235, doi:10.1051/LAIT:2003012 (2003).
  • Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
  • Nirmalakhandan, N. N. & Speece, R. E.: QSAR model for predicting Henry’s constant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 22, 1349–1357, doi:10.1021/ES00176A016 (1988).
  • Plyasunov, A. V., Plyasunova, N. V., & Shock, E. L.: Group contribution values for the thermodynamic functions of hydration of aliphatic esters at 298.15 K, 0.1 MPa, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 49, 1152–1167, doi:10.1021/JE049850A (2004).
  • Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., & Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry’s law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7643–7654, doi:10.5194/ACP-10-7643-2010 (2010).
  • Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., & Koide, K.: Application of principal components analysis to calculate Henry’s constant from molecular structure, Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-L (1992).
  • Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
  • Yao, X., aand X. Zhang, M. L., Hu, Z., & Fan, B.: Radial basis function network-based quantitative structure-property relationship for the prediction of Henry’s law constant, Anal. Chim. Acta, 462, 101–117, doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00273-8 (2002).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Chemical Properties Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN 0070734011 (1999).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Yaws’ Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds, Knovel: Norwich, NY, USA, ISBN 1591244447 (2003).

Type

Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V) VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T) thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C) citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1 of Sander (2023) for further details.

Notes

1) A detailed temperature dependence with more than one parameter is available in the original publication. Here, only the temperature dependence at 298.15 K according to the van 't Hoff equation is presented.
11) Measured at high temperature and extrapolated to T⊖ = 298.15 K.
14) Value at T = 310 K.
21) Several references are given in the list of Henry's law constants but not assigned to specific species.
38) Value at T = 303 K.
68) Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here.
186) Experimental value, extracted from HENRYWIN.
230) Yao et al. (2002) compared two QSPR methods and found that radial basis function networks (RBFNs) are better than multiple linear regression. In their paper, they provide neither a definition nor the unit of their Henry's law constants. Comparing the values with those that they cite from Yaws (1999), it is assumed that they use the variant Hvpx and the unit atm.
231) English and Carroll (2001) provide several calculations. Here, the preferred value with explicit inclusion of hydrogen bonding parameters from a neural network is shown.
232) Value from the training dataset.
233) Calculated with a principal component analysis (PCA); see Suzuki et al. (1992) for details.
238) Value given here as quoted by Gharagheizi et al. (2010).
244) Calculated using the GROMHE model.
245) Calculated using the SPARC approach.
246) Calculated using the HENRYWIN method.
247) Calculated using a combination of a group contribution method and neural networks.
249) Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here.
250) Value from the training set.
272) Value from the validation dataset.
299) Value given here as quoted by Staudinger and Roberts (1996).
300) Value from the test set for true external validation.
401) Calculated for an aqueous solution containing 60 % ethanol by volume as the solvent.

The numbers of the notes are the same as in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be found here.

* * *

Search Henry's Law Database

Species Search:
Identifier Search:
Reference Search:

* * *

Convert Henry's Law Constants

Convert:

* * *