MPG

Henry's Law Constants

www.henrys-law.org

Rolf Sander

NEW: Version 5.0.0 has been published in October 2023

Atmospheric Chemistry Division

Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry
Mainz, Germany

Home

Henry's Law Constants

Notes

References

Download

Errata

Contact, Imprint, Acknowledgements

When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite this publication:

R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023), doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023

The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015, which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.

Henry's Law Constants → Organic species with nitrogen (N) → Heterocycles with nitrogen (C, H, N) → pyridine

FORMULA:C5H5N
CAS RN:110-86-1
STRUCTURE
(FROM NIST):
InChIKey:JUJWROOIHBZHMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hscp d ln Hs cp / d (1/T) References Type Notes
[mol/(m3Pa)] [K]
9.1×10−1 4700 Brockbank (2013) L
1.1 6000 Bernauer and Dohnal (2009) M
4.6×10−2 -2300 Dewulf et al. (1999) M
9.8×10−1 Welke et al. (1998) M
5.5×10−1 Chaintreau et al. (1995) M
8.2×10−1 Hawthorne et al. (1985) M
1.1 Arnett and Chawla (1979) M 561)
7.1×10−1 Amoore and Buttery (1978) M
1.1 5900 Andon et al. (1954) M 338)
8.4×10−1 Keshavarz et al. (2022) Q
2.4×10−1 Duchowicz et al. (2020) Q 300)
1.1 Li et al. (2014) Q 242)
7.5×10−1 Hilal et al. (2008) Q
6.4×10−1 Modarresi et al. (2007) Q 68)
6000 Kühne et al. (2005) Q
1.2 Yaffe et al. (2003) Q 249) 250)
1.3 Yao et al. (2002) Q 230)
1.2 English and Carroll (2001) Q 231) 232)
9.0×10−2 Katritzky et al. (1998) Q
1.8 Nirmalakhandan et al. (1997) Q
3.3 Russell et al. (1992) Q 280)
1.2 Suzuki et al. (1992) Q 233)
9.0×10−1 Duchowicz et al. (2020) ? 21) 186)
1.1 Mackay et al. (2006d) ?
5400 Kühne et al. (2005) ?
1.1 Yaws (1999) ? 21)
8.9×10−1 Yaws and Yang (1992) ? 21)
1.1 Abraham et al. (1990) ?
Staudinger and Roberts (2001) W 562)

Data

The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant Hscp at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence d ln Hs cp / d (1/T), also at the reference temperature.

References

  • Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Fuchs, R., & Chambers, E. J.: Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 291–300, doi:10.1039/P29900000291 (1990).
  • Amoore, J. E. & Buttery, R. G.: Partition coefficient and comparative olfactometry, Chem. Senses Flavour, 3, 57–71, doi:10.1093/CHEMSE/3.1.57 (1978).
  • Andon, R. J. L., Cox, J. D., & Herington, E. F. G.: Phase relationships in the pyridine series. Part V. The thermodynamic properties of dilute solutions of pyridine bases in water at 25∘ and 40∘, J. Chem. Soc., pp. 3188–3196, doi:10.1039/JR9540003188 (1954).
  • Arnett, E. M. & Chawla, B.: Complete thermodynamic analysis of the hydration of thirteen pyridines and pyridinium ions. The special case of 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 7141–7146, doi:10.1021/JA00518A001 (1979).
  • Bernauer, M. & Dohnal, V.: Temperature dependences of limiting activity coefficients and Henry’s law constants for N-methylpyrrolidone, pyridine, and piperidine in water, Fluid Phase Equilib., 282, 100–107, doi:10.1016/J.FLUID.2009.05.005 (2009).
  • Brockbank, S. A.: Aqueous Henry’s law constants, infinite dilution activity coefficients, and water solubility: critically evaluated database, experimental analysis, and prediction methods, Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University, USA, URL https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3691/ (2013).
  • Chaintreau, A., Grade, A., & Muñoz-Box, R.: Determination of partition coefficients and quantitation of headspace volatile compounds, Anal. Chem., 67, 3300–3304, doi:10.1021/AC00114A029 (1995).
  • Dewulf, J., van Langenhove, H., & Everaert, P.: Determination of Henry’s law coefficients by combination of the equilibrium partitioning in closed systems and solid-phase microextraction techniques, J. Chromatogr. A, 830, 353–363, doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00877-2 (1999).
  • Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
  • English, N. J. & Carroll, D. G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by a quantitative structure property relationship and neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1150–1161, doi:10.1021/CI010361D (2001).
  • Hawthorne, S. B., Sievers, R. E., & Barkley, R. M.: Organic emissions from shale oil wastewaters and their implications for air quality, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 992–997, doi:10.1021/ES00140A018 (1985).
  • Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
  • Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
  • Keshavarz, M. H., Rezaei, M., & Hosseini, S. H.: A simple approach for prediction of Henry’s law constant of pesticides, solvents, aromatic hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants without using complex computer codes and descriptors, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 162, 867–877, doi:10.1016/J.PSEP.2022.04.045 (2022).
  • Kühne, R., Ebert, R.-U., & Schüürmann, G.: Prediction of the temperature dependency of Henry’s law constant from chemical structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6705–6711, doi:10.1021/ES050527H (2005).
  • Li, H., Wang, X., Yi, T., Xu, Z., & Liu, X.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants for organic compounds using multilayer feedforward neural networks based on linear salvation energy relationship, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 6, 1557–1564 (2014).
  • Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., Ma, K. C., & Lee, S. C.: Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. IV of Nitrogen and Sulfur Containing Compounds and Pesticides, CRC/Taylor & Francis Group, doi:10.1201/9781420044393 (2006d).
  • Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
  • Nirmalakhandan, N., Brennan, R. A., & Speece, R. E.: Predicting Henry’s law constant and the effect of temperature on Henry’s law constant, Wat. Res., 31, 1471–1481, doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00395-8 (1997).
  • Russell, C. J., Dixon, S. L., & Jurs, P. C.: Computer-assisted study of the relationship between molecular structure and Henry’s law constant, Anal. Chem., 64, 1350–1355, doi:10.1021/AC00037A009 (1992).
  • Staudinger, J. & Roberts, P. V.: A critical compilation of Henry’s law constant temperature dependence relations for organic compounds in dilute aqueous solutions, Chemosphere, 44, 561–576, doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00505-1 (2001).
  • Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., & Koide, K.: Application of principal components analysis to calculate Henry’s constant from molecular structure, Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-L (1992).
  • Welke, B., Ettlinger, K., & Riederer, M.: Sorption of volatile organic chemicals in plant surfaces, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 1099–1104, doi:10.1021/ES970763V (1998).
  • Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
  • Yao, X., aand X. Zhang, M. L., Hu, Z., & Fan, B.: Radial basis function network-based quantitative structure-property relationship for the prediction of Henry’s law constant, Anal. Chim. Acta, 462, 101–117, doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00273-8 (2002).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Chemical Properties Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN 0070734011 (1999).
  • Yaws, C. L. & Yang, H.-C.: Henry’s law constant for compound in water, in: Thermodynamic and Physical Property Data, edited by Yaws, C. L., pp. 181–206, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX, ISBN 0884150313 (1992).

Type

Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V) VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T) thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C) citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1 of Sander (2023) for further details.

Notes

21) Several references are given in the list of Henry's law constants but not assigned to specific species.
68) Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here.
186) Experimental value, extracted from HENRYWIN.
230) Yao et al. (2002) compared two QSPR methods and found that radial basis function networks (RBFNs) are better than multiple linear regression. In their paper, they provide neither a definition nor the unit of their Henry's law constants. Comparing the values with those that they cite from Yaws (1999), it is assumed that they use the variant Hvpx and the unit atm.
231) English and Carroll (2001) provide several calculations. Here, the preferred value with explicit inclusion of hydrogen bonding parameters from a neural network is shown.
232) Value from the training dataset.
233) Calculated with a principal component analysis (PCA); see Suzuki et al. (1992) for details.
242) Temperature is not specified.
249) Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here.
250) Value from the training set.
280) Value from the training set.
300) Value from the test set for true external validation.
338) Calculated using Gh and Hh from Table 2 in Andon et al. (1954). Note that the thermodynamic functions in that table are not based on their α in Table 1. Instead, the expression exp(−Gh/(RT)) yields the Henry's law constant Hsxp in the unit 1/atm.
561) Calculated using ∆Gsg→ H2O and ∆Hsg→ H2O from Table IV of Arnett and Chawla (1979). Since some of the values in this table are taken directly from Andon et al. (1954), it is assumed that the thermodynamic properties are defined in the same way. Since ∆Hsg→ H2O is defined relative to pyridine, a value of −11.93 kcal mol−1 from Arnett et al. (1977) was added.
562) Due to an apparently incorrect definition of the Henry's law constant by Andon et al. (1954), Staudinger and Roberts (2001) quote incorrect values from that paper.

The numbers of the notes are the same as in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be found here.

* * *

Search Henry's Law Database

Species Search:
Identifier Search:
Reference Search:

* * *

Convert Henry's Law Constants

Convert:

* * *