MPG

Henry's Law Constants

www.henrys-law.org

Rolf Sander

NEW: Version 5.0.0 has been published in October 2023

Atmospheric Chemistry Division

Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry
Mainz, Germany


Home

Henry's Law Constants

Notes

References

Download

Errata

Contact, Imprint, Acknowledgements


When referring to the compilation of Henry's Law Constants, please cite this publication:

R. Sander: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901-12440 (2023), doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023

The publication from 2023 replaces that from 2015, which is now obsolete. Please do not cite the old paper anymore.


Henry's Law ConstantsHydrocarbons (C, H)Mononuclear aromatics → 1,4-dimethylbenzene

FORMULA:C6H4(CH3)2
TRIVIAL NAME: p-xylene
CAS RN:106-42-3
STRUCTURE
(FROM NIST):
InChIKey:URLKBWYHVLBVBO-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Hscp d ln Hs cp / d (1/T) References Type Notes
[mol/(m3Pa)] [K]
1.5×10−3 5000 Schwardt et al. (2021) L 1)
1.4×10−3 5000 Brockbank (2013) L 1)
1.9×10−3 4200 Fogg and Sangster (2003) L
1.3×10−3 4000 Staudinger and Roberts (2001) L
1.4×10−3 4600 Plyasunov and Shock (2000) L
1.3×10−3 3800 Staudinger and Roberts (1996) L
1.4×10−3 Mackay and Shiu (1981) L
1.0×10−3 2600 Schwardt et al. (2021) M 11) 351)
1.3×10−3 Kim and Kim (2014) M
1.4×10−3 Li et al. (2008) M
1.6×10−3 4800 Lin and Chou (2006) M
2.0×10−3 Bobadilla et al. (2003) M
6.7×10−4 McIntosh and Heffron (2000) M 14)
1.4×10−3 Ryu and Park (1999) M
1.5×10−3 Dohnal and Hovorka (1999) M
1.5×10−3 2900 Kondoh and Nakajima (1997) M
9.8×10−4 3200 Park et al. (1997) M
1.7×10−3 4800 Dewulf et al. (1995) M
1.2×10−3 3100 Hansen et al. (1993) M 282)
1.3×10−3 Li and Carr (1993) M
1.4×10−3 Li et al. (1993) M
1.7×10−3 Zhang and Pawliszyn (1993) M
1.2×10−3 5300 Bissonette et al. (1990) M
1.3×10−3 3500 Ashworth et al. (1988) M 279)
1.3×10−3 4800 Sanemasa et al. (1982) M
6.1×10−4 Sato and Nakajima (1979a) M 14)
2.3×10−3 5400 Wasik and Tsang (1970) M
1.2×10−3 Martins et al. (2017) V 316)
1.8×10−4 Abraham and Acree (2007) V
1.7×10−3 Mackay et al. (2006a) V
1.4×10−3 Shiu and Ma (2000) V
1.5×10−3 Park et al. (1997) V
1.7×10−3 Mackay et al. (1992a) V
1.5×10−3 Hwang et al. (1992) V
1.8×10−3 Eastcott et al. (1988) V
1.6×10−3 Hine and Mookerjee (1975) V
1.6×10−3 4800 Wauchope and Haque (1972) V
1.6×10−3 4900 Andon et al. (1954) V 338)
1.6×10−3 Bohon and Claussen (1951) V
1.4×10−3 Foster et al. (1994) X 352)
1.6×10−3 Yaws (2003) X 238)
1.4×10−3 Sieg et al. (2008) C
1.3×10−3 Schüürmann (2000) C 21)
1.3×10−3 Keshavarz et al. (2022) Q
1.6×10−3 Duchowicz et al. (2020) Q 185)
2.3×10−3 Wang et al. (2017) Q 81) 239)
1.4×10−3 Wang et al. (2017) Q 81) 240)
2.6×10−3 Wang et al. (2017) Q 81) 241)
9.8×10−4 Gharagheizi et al. (2012) Q
9.9×10−4 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 244) 272)
1.6×10−3 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 245)
1.6×10−3 Raventos-Duran et al. (2010) Q 246)
1.9×10−3 Gharagheizi et al. (2010) Q 247)
1.5×10−3 Hilal et al. (2008) Q
1.1×10−3 Modarresi et al. (2007) Q 68)
4700 Kühne et al. (2005) Q
1.5×10−3 Yaffe et al. (2003) Q 249) 250)
8.1×10−4 Yao et al. (2002) Q 230)
1.7×10−3 English and Carroll (2001) Q 231) 232)
3.9×10−4 Katritzky et al. (1998) Q
1.0×10−3 Suzuki et al. (1992) Q 233)
1.1×10−3 Nirmalakhandan and Speece (1988) Q
1.4×10−3 Duchowicz et al. (2020) ? 21) 186)
4500 Kühne et al. (2005) ?
1.6×10−3 Yaws (1999) ? 21)
6.4×10−4 Abraham and Weathersby (1994) ? 21)
1.6×10−3 Yaws and Yang (1992) ? 21)
1.4×10−3 Abraham et al. (1990) ?

Data

The first column contains Henry's law solubility constant Hscp at the reference temperature of 298.15 K.
The second column contains the temperature dependence d ln Hs cp / d (1/T), also at the reference temperature.

References

  • Abraham, M. H. & Acree, Jr., W. E.: Prediction of gas to water partition coefficients from 273 to 373 K using predicted enthalpies and heat capacities of hydration, Fluid Phase Equilib., 262, 97–110, doi:10.1016/J.FLUID.2007.08.011 (2007).
  • Abraham, M. H. & Weathersby, P. K.: Hydrogen bonding. 30. Solubility of gases and vapors in biological liquids and tissues, J. Pharm. Sci., 83, 1450–1456, doi:10.1002/JPS.2600831017 (1994).
  • Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Fuchs, R., & Chambers, E. J.: Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 291–300, doi:10.1039/P29900000291 (1990).
  • Andon, R. J. L., Cox, J. D., & Herington, E. F. G.: Phase relationships in the pyridine series. Part V. The thermodynamic properties of dilute solutions of pyridine bases in water at 25 and 40, J. Chem. Soc., pp. 3188–3196, doi:10.1039/JR9540003188 (1954).
  • Ashworth, R. A., Howe, G. B., Mullins, M. E., & Rogers, T. N.: Air–water partitioning coefficients of organics in dilute aqueous solutions, J. Hazard. Mater., 18, 25–36, doi:10.1016/0304-3894(88)85057-X (1988).
  • Bissonette, E. M., Westrick, J. J., & Morand, J. M.: Determination of Henry’s coefficient for volatile organic compounds in dilute aqueous systems, in: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Water Works Association, Cincinnati, OH, June 17–21, pp. 1913–1922 (1990).
  • Bobadilla, R., Huybrechts, T., Dewulf, J., & van Langenhove, H.: Determination of the Henry’s constant of volatile and semi-volatile organic componuds of environmental concern by the bas (batch air stripping) technique: a new mathematical approach, J. Chilean Chem. Soc., 48, doi:10.4067/S0717-97072003000300001 (2003).
  • Bohon, R. J. & Claussen, W. F.: The solubility of aromatic hydrocarbons in water, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 1571–1578, doi:10.1021/JA01148A047 (1951).
  • Brockbank, S. A.: Aqueous Henry’s law constants, infinite dilution activity coefficients, and water solubility: critically evaluated database, experimental analysis, and prediction methods, Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University, USA, URL https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3691/ (2013).
  • Dewulf, J., Drijvers, D., & van Langenhove, H.: Measurement of Henry’s law constant as function of temperature and salinity for the low temperature range, Atmos. Environ., 29, 323–331, doi:10.1016/1352-2310(94)00256-K (1995).
  • Dohnal, V. & Hovorka, Š.: Exponential saturator: a novel gas-liquid partitioning technique for measurement of large limiting activity coefficients, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 2036–2043, doi:10.1021/IE980743H (1999).
  • Duchowicz, P. R., Aranda, J. F., Bacelo, D. E., & Fioressi, S. E.: QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 154, 115–121, doi:10.1016/J.CHERD.2019.12.009 (2020).
  • Eastcott, L., Shiu, W. Y., & Mackay, D.: Environmentally relevant physical-chemical properties of hydrocarbons: A review of data and development of simple correlations, Oil Chem. Pollut., 4, 191–216, doi:10.1016/S0269-8579(88)80020-0 (1988).
  • English, N. J. & Carroll, D. G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constants by a quantitative structure property relationship and neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1150–1161, doi:10.1021/CI010361D (2001).
  • Fogg, P. & Sangster, J.: Chemicals in the Atmosphere: Solubility, Sources and Reactivity, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-98651-5 (2003).
  • Foster, P., Ferronato, C., & Jacob, V.: Organic-compound transfer between gas-phase and raindrops – 1st experiments in a simulation chamber, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 3, 318–323 (1994).
  • Gharagheizi, F., Abbasi, R., & Tirandazi, B.: Prediction of Henry’s law constant of organic compounds in water from a new group-contribution-based model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 10 149–10 152, doi:10.1021/IE101532E (2010).
  • Gharagheizi, F., Eslamimanesh, A., Mohammadi, A. H., & Richon, D.: Empirical method for estimation of Henry’s law constant of non-electrolyte organic compounds in water, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 47, 295–299, doi:10.1016/J.JCT.2011.11.015 (2012).
  • Hansen, K. C., Zhou, Z., Yaws, C. L., & Aminabhavi, T. M.: Determination of Henry’s law constants of organics in dilute aqueous solutions, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 38, 546–550, doi:10.1021/JE00012A017 (1993).
  • Hilal, S. H., Ayyampalayam, S. N., & Carreira, L. A.: Air-liquid partition coefficient for a diverse set of organic compounds: Henry’s law constant in water and hexadecane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9231–9236, doi:10.1021/ES8005783 (2008).
  • Hine, J. & Mookerjee, P. K.: The intrinsic hydrophilic character of organic compounds. Correlations in terms of structural contributions, J. Org. Chem., 40, 292–298, doi:10.1021/JO00891A006 (1975).
  • Hwang, Y.-L., Olson, J. D., & Keller, II, G. E.: Steam stripping for removal of organic pollutants from water. 2. Vapor-liquid equilibrium data, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1759–1768, doi:10.1021/IE00007A022 (1992).
  • Katritzky, A. R., Wang, Y., Sild, S., Tamm, T., & Karelson, M.: QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38, 720–725, doi:10.1021/CI980022T (1998).
  • Keshavarz, M. H., Rezaei, M., & Hosseini, S. H.: A simple approach for prediction of Henry’s law constant of pesticides, solvents, aromatic hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants without using complex computer codes and descriptors, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 162, 867–877, doi:10.1016/J.PSEP.2022.04.045 (2022).
  • Kim, Y.-H. & Kim, K.-H.: Recent advances in thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometery method to eliminate the matrix effect between air and water samples: Application to the accurate determination of Henry’s law constant, J. Chromatogr. A, 1342, 78–85, doi:10.1016/J.CHROMA.2014.03.040 (2014).
  • Kondoh, H. & Nakajima, T.: Optimization of headspace cryofocus gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the analysis of 54 volatile organic compounds, and the measurement of their Henry’s constants, J. Environ. Chem., 7, 81–89, doi:10.5985/JEC.7.81 (1997).
  • Kühne, R., Ebert, R.-U., & Schüürmann, G.: Prediction of the temperature dependency of Henry’s law constant from chemical structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 6705–6711, doi:10.1021/ES050527H (2005).
  • Li, J. & Carr, P. W.: Measurement of water-hexadecane partition coefficients by headspace gas chromatography and calculation of limiting activity coefficients in water, Anal. Chem., 65, 1443–1450, doi:10.1021/AC00058A023 (1993).
  • Li, J., Dallas, A. J., Eikens, D. I., Carr, P. W., Bergmann, D. L., Hait, M. J., & Eckert, C. A.: Measurement of large infinite dilution activity coefficients of nonelectrolytes in water by inert gas stripping and gas chromatography, Anal. Chem., 65, 3212–3218, doi:10.1021/AC00070A008 (1993).
  • Li, J.-Q., Shen, C.-Y., Xu, G.-H., Wang, H.-M., Jiang, H.-H., Han, H.-Y., Chu, Y.-N., & Zheng, P.-C.: Dynamic measurements of Henry’s law constant of aromatic compounds using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 24, 705–708 (2008).
  • Lin, J.-H. & Chou, M.-S.: Temperature effects on Henry’s law constants for four VOCs in air-activated sludge systems, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2469–2477, doi:10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2005.12.037 (2006).
  • Mackay, D. & Shiu, W. Y.: A critical review of Henry’s law constants for chemicals of environmental interest, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 10, 1175–1199, doi:10.1063/1.555654 (1981).
  • Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., & Ma, K. C.: Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. I of Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons, Chlorobenzenes, and PCBs, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, ISBN 0873715136 (1992a).
  • Mackay, D., Shiu, W. Y., Ma, K. C., & Lee, S. C.: Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, vol. I of Introduction and Hydrocarbons, CRC/Taylor & Francis Group, doi:10.1201/9781420044393 (2006a).
  • Martins, M. A. R., Silva, L. P., Ferreira, O., Schröder, B., Coutinho, J. A. P., & Pinho, S. P.: Terpenes solubility in water and their environmental distribution, J. Mol. Liq., 241, 996–1002, doi:10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2017.06.099 (2017).
  • McIntosh, J. M. & Heffron, J. J. A.: Modelling alterations in the partition coefficient in in vitro biological systems using headspace gas chromatography, J. Chromatogr. B, 738, 207–216, doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(99)00506-X (2000).
  • Modarresi, H., Modarress, H., & Dearden, J. C.: QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach, Chemosphere, 66, 2067–2076, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2006.09.049 (2007).
  • Nirmalakhandan, N. N. & Speece, R. E.: QSAR model for predicting Henry’s constant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 22, 1349–1357, doi:10.1021/ES00176A016 (1988).
  • Park, S.-J., Han, S.-D., & Ryu, S.-A.: Measurement of air/water partition coefficient (Henry’s law constant) by using EPICS method and their relationship with vapor pressure and water solubility, J. Korean Inst. Chem. Eng., 35, 915–920 (1997).
  • Plyasunov, A. V. & Shock, E. L.: Thermodynamic functions of hydration of hydrocarbons at 298.15K and 0.1MPa, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 439–468, doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00330-0 (2000).
  • Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., & Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry’s law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7643–7654, doi:10.5194/ACP-10-7643-2010 (2010).
  • Ryu, S.-A. & Park, S.-J.: A rapid determination method of the air/water partition coefficient and its application, Fluid Phase Equilib., 161, 295–304, doi:10.1016/S0378-3812(99)00193-4 (1999).
  • Sanemasa, I., Araki, M., Deguchi, T., & Nagai, H.: Solubility measurements of benzene and the alkylbenzenes in water by making use of solute vapor, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 55, 1054–1062, doi:10.1246/BCSJ.55.1054 (1982).
  • Sato, A. & Nakajima, T.: Partition coefficients of some aromatic hydrocarbons and ketones in water, blood and oil, Br. J. Ind. Med., 36, 231–234, doi:10.1136/OEM.36.3.231 (1979a).
  • Schüürmann, G.: Prediction of Henry’s law constant of benzene derivatives using quantum chemical continuum-solvation models, J. Comput. Chem., 21, 17–34, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000115)21:1<17::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-5 (2000).
  • Schwardt, A., Dahmke, A., & Köber, R.: Henry’s law constants of volatile organic compounds between 0 and 95C – Data compilation and complementation in context of urban temperature increases of the subsurface, Chemosphere, 272, 129 858, doi:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.129858 (2021).
  • Shiu, W. Y. & Ma, K.-C.: Temperature dependence of physical-chemical properties of selected chemicals of environmental interest. I. mononuclear and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 29, 41–130, doi:10.1063/1.556055 (2000).
  • Sieg, K., Fries, E., & Püttmann, W.: Analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and n-aldehydes in melted snow water via solid-phase dynamic extraction combined with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1178, 178–186, doi:10.1016/J.CHROMA.2007.11.025 (2008).
  • Staudinger, J. & Roberts, P. V.: A critical review of Henry’s law constants for environmental applications, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 205–297, doi:10.1080/10643389609388492 (1996).
  • Staudinger, J. & Roberts, P. V.: A critical compilation of Henry’s law constant temperature dependence relations for organic compounds in dilute aqueous solutions, Chemosphere, 44, 561–576, doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00505-1 (2001).
  • Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., & Koide, K.: Application of principal components analysis to calculate Henry’s constant from molecular structure, Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-L (1992).
  • Wang, C., Yuan, T., Wood, S. A., Goss, K.-U., Li, J., Ying, Q., & Wania, F.: Uncertain Henry’s law constants compromise equilibrium partitioning calculations of atmospheric oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7529–7540, doi:10.5194/ACP-17-7529-2017 (2017).
  • Wasik, S. P. & Tsang, W.: Gas chromatographic determination of partition coefficients of some unsaturated hydrocarbons and their deuterated isomers in aqueous silver nitrate solutions, J. Phys. Chem., 74, 2970–2976, doi:10.1021/J100709A023 (1970).
  • Wauchope, R. D. & Haque, R.: Aqueous solutions of nonpolar compounds. Heat-capacity effects, Can. J. Chem., 50, 133–138, doi:10.1139/V72-022 (1972).
  • Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., & Giralt, F.: A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry’s law constant of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 85–112, doi:10.1021/CI025561J (2003).
  • Yao, X., aand X. Zhang, M. L., Hu, Z., & Fan, B.: Radial basis function network-based quantitative structure-property relationship for the prediction of Henry’s law constant, Anal. Chim. Acta, 462, 101–117, doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00273-8 (2002).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Chemical Properties Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN 0070734011 (1999).
  • Yaws, C. L.: Yaws’ Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds, Knovel: Norwich, NY, USA, ISBN 1591244447 (2003).
  • Yaws, C. L. & Yang, H.-C.: Henry’s law constant for compound in water, in: Thermodynamic and Physical Property Data, edited by Yaws, C. L., pp. 181–206, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX, ISBN 0884150313 (1992).
  • Zhang, Z. & Pawliszyn, J.: Headspace solid-phase microextraction, Anal. Chem., 65, 1843–1852, doi:10.1021/AC00062A008 (1993).

Type

Table entries are sorted according to reliability of the data, listing the most reliable type first: L) literature review, M) measured, V) VP/AS = vapor pressure/aqueous solubility, R) recalculation, T) thermodynamical calculation, X) original paper not available, C) citation, Q) QSPR, E) estimate, ?) unknown, W) wrong. See Section 3.1 of Sander (2023) for further details.

Notes

1) A detailed temperature dependence with more than one parameter is available in the original publication. Here, only the temperature dependence at 298.15 K according to the van 't Hoff equation is presented.
11) Measured at high temperature and extrapolated to T = 298.15 K.
14) Value at T = 310 K.
21) Several references are given in the list of Henry's law constants but not assigned to specific species.
68) Modarresi et al. (2007) use different descriptors for their calculations. They conclude that a genetic algorithm/radial basis function network (GA/RBFN) is the best QSPR model. Only these results are shown here.
81) Value at T = 288 K.
185) Value from the validation set for checking whether the model is satisfactory for compounds that are absent from the training set.
186) Experimental value, extracted from HENRYWIN.
230) Yao et al. (2002) compared two QSPR methods and found that radial basis function networks (RBFNs) are better than multiple linear regression. In their paper, they provide neither a definition nor the unit of their Henry's law constants. Comparing the values with those that they cite from Yaws (1999), it is assumed that they use the variant Hvpx and the unit atm.
231) English and Carroll (2001) provide several calculations. Here, the preferred value with explicit inclusion of hydrogen bonding parameters from a neural network is shown.
232) Value from the training dataset.
233) Calculated with a principal component analysis (PCA); see Suzuki et al. (1992) for details.
238) Value given here as quoted by Gharagheizi et al. (2010).
239) Calculated using linear free energy relationships (LFERs).
240) Calculated using SPARC Performs Automated Reasoning in Chemistry (SPARC).
241) Calculated using COSMOtherm.
244) Calculated using the GROMHE model.
245) Calculated using the SPARC approach.
246) Calculated using the HENRYWIN method.
247) Calculated using a combination of a group contribution method and neural networks.
249) Yaffe et al. (2003) present QSPR results calculated with the fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) and with the back-propagation (BK-Pr) method. They conclude that FAM is better. Only the FAM results are shown here.
250) Value from the training set.
272) Value from the validation dataset.
279) Data are taken from the report by Howe et al. (1987).
282) The same data were also published in Hansen et al. (1995).
316) Values for the Henry's law constants shown in Fig. 3 of Martins et al. (2017) were obtained from Simão Pinho (personal communication, 2022).
338) Calculated using Gh and Hh from Table 2 in Andon et al. (1954). Note that the thermodynamic functions in that table are not based on their α in Table 1. Instead, the expression exp(−Gh/(RT)) yields the Henry's law constant Hsxp in the unit 1/atm.
351) The data from Schwardt et al. (2021) were fitted to the three-parameter equation: Hscp= exp( 100.47045 −2603.76722/T −17.31043 ln(T)) mol m−3 Pa−1, with T in K.
352) Value given here as quoted by HSDB (2015).

The numbers of the notes are the same as in Sander (2023). References cited in the notes can be found here.

* * *

Search Henry's Law Database

Species Search:

Identifier Search:

Reference Search:

* * *

Convert Henry's Law Constants

Convert:

* * *